Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VTS · against 101 other Energy companies of similar size
Ranked #46 of 102 · scores higher than 55% of peers · safety percentile 54
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)9 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including VTS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity, but weaker current ratio and beta than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | VTS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 98 reported | 0.25× | 0.51× | 69% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 100 reported | 0.63 | 0.40 | 36% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 103 reported | 1.06× | 1.46× | 31% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 2 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 3 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 4 | 1.2B USD | 98 | 68 | |
| 5 | 10.1B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 50 | |
| 42 | 1.2B USD | 59 | 73 | |
| 43 | 2.4B CNY (≈$337M) | 58 | 45 | |
| 44 | 320M EUR (≈$352M) | 57 | 69 | |
| 45 | 4.8B CNY (≈$672M) | 56 | 31 | |
| 46 | 651M USD | 54 | 39 | |
| 47 | 674M USD | 53 | 45 | |
| 48 | 590M USD | 53 | 21 | |
| 49 | 408M USD | 52 | 55 | |
| 50 | 18.6B THB (≈$522M) | 50 | 61 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score