Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
NGS · against 398 other Energy companies
Ranked #192 of 399 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 52
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including NGS · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger current ratio, but weaker debt / equity than most Energy peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | NGS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 392 reported | 1.12× | 0.49× | 21% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 392 reported | 0.47 | 0.48 | 51% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 395 reported | 2.01× | 1.37× | 74% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$341M) | 100 | 71 | |
| 1 | 3.3B USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 1.0B USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 4 | 41M USD | 99 | 25 | |
| 5 | 1.18T ARS (≈$1.2B) | 99 | 98 | |
| 188 | 25.0B NOK (≈$2.4B) | 53 | 57 | |
| 189 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 674M USD |
| 53 |
| 45 |
| 190 | 590M USD | 53 | 21 |
| 191 | 5.0B AUD (≈$3.3B) | 52 | 34 |
| 192 | 408M USD | 52 | 55 |
| 193 | 28.4B USD | 52 | 48 |
| 194 | 16.7B USD | 52 | 70 |
| 195 | 2.5B CAD (≈$1.8B) | 51 | 69 |
| 196 | 20.1B USD | 51 | 65 |