Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Verisk Analytics, Inc.
How Verisk Analytics, Inc. stacks up
VRSK · against 164 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
51/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #98 of 165 · scores higher than 40% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score22 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including VRSK · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 51?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 3.8% vs peer median 7.1%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 5.0% vs peer median 4.4%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 6.9% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VRSK, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VRSK | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 166 reported | 5.0% | 7.1% | 38% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 147 reported | 3.8% | 10.6% | 34% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 164 reported | 6.9% | 6.4% | 53% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VRSK| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.22T INR (≈$14.6B) | 99 | 72 | |
| 2 | 18.35T KRW (≈$13.2B) | 97 | 56 | |
| 2 | 1.39T INR (≈$16.7B) | 97 | 54 | |
| 4 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 5 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 95 | 2.02T JPY (≈$13.8B) | 52 | 27 | |
| 95 | 24.6B USD | 52 | 49 | |
| 98 | 17.5B USD | 51 | 60 | |
| 98 | 17.0B CHF (≈$19.6B) | 51 | 48 | |
| 98 | 25.6B USD | 51 | 50 | |
| 101 | 11.8B EUR (≈$13.0B) | 50 | 57 | |
| 102 | 387.5B HKD (≈$49.6B) | 49 | 48 | |
| 102 | 247.0B HKD (≈$31.6B) | 49 | 43 | |
| 102 | 15.8B EUR (≈$17.4B) | 49 | 50 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score