Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Valmont Industries, Inc.
How Valmont Industries, Inc. stacks up
VMI · against 472 other Industrials companies listed in US-listed
Valuation
56/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #132 of 473 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score62 peers with a valuation score of 50–59, including VMI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 56?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.4% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.8% vs peer median 3.7%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.9% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VMI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VMI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 468 reported | 5.8% | 3.0% | 84% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 472 reported | 7.4% | 6.3% | 62% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 430 reported | 3.8% | 3.3% | 57% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 466 reported | 20.4% | 32.3% | 34% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VMI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 323M USD | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 132 | 1.6B USD | 56 | 29 | |
| 132 | 814M USD | 56 | 26 | |
| 132 | 1.1B USD | 56 | 56 | |
| 132 | 334M USD | 56 | 49 | |
| 132 | 8.5B USD | 56 | 66 | |
| 141 | 2.0B USD | 55 | 42 | |
| 141 | 97M USD | 55 | 44 | |
| 141 | 5.3B USD | 55 | 60 | |
| 141 | 984M USD | 55 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score