Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Village Super Market, Inc.
How Village Super Market, Inc. stacks up
VLGEA · against 806 other Consumer Defensive companies
Growth
55/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #360 of 807 · scores higher than 55% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score81 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including VLGEA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 55?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Defensive norm.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.6% vs peer median 3.7%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 3.7% vs peer median 2.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 64% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 12.1% vs peer median 1.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VLGEA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VLGEA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 813 reported | 3.7% | 2.8% | 54% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 595 reported | 12.1% | 1.4% | 64% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 801 reported | 3.6% | 3.7% | 50% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VLGEA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 945M EUR (≈$1.0B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 30.7B BRL (≈$5.5B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 5.5B USD | 100 | 84 | |
| 4 | 82.5B JPY (≈$561M) | 99 | 69 | |
| 4 | 2.4B CNY (≈$329M) | 99 | 29 | |
| 360 | 8.5B CNY (≈$1.2B) | 55 | 53 | |
| 360 | 820.6B CLP (≈$903M) | 55 | 57 | |
| 360 | 3.0B EUR (≈$3.3B) | 55 | 54 | |
| 360 | 1.8B GBP (≈$2.3B) | 55 | 59 | |
| 360 | 618M USD | 55 | 54 | |
| 368 | 378.7B JPY (≈$2.6B) | 54 | 62 | |
| 368 | 50.0B JPY (≈$340M) | 54 | 44 | |
| 368 | 1.8B MYR (≈$407M) | 54 | 66 | |
| 368 | 832M MYR (≈$183M) | 54 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score