Ranked #224 of 239 · scores higher than 5% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score
30 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including VIRT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 5?
Weighted metrics compared with all Banks & Insurance companies.
Mainly because of its book yield, which is weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
▼a higher price relative to book value (P/B): weaker than 86% of peers. Book yield: 40.1% vs peer median 79.5%
▲higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 1.8% vs peer median 7.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VIRT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
VIRT
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Earnings yieldHigher is better · 244 reported
11.7%
7.7%
83%
60%
EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 59 reported
Not reported
10.6%
—
—
Context only
Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 130 reported
10.2%
8.5%
60%
Context only
Book yieldHigher is better · 239 reported
39.8%
77.3%
18%
40%
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
