Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
MARA · against 917 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #877 of 918 · scores higher than 4% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score88 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including MARA · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield and book yield, which are weaker than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | MARA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 928 reported | -131.3% | 8.1% | 0% | 60% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 228 reported | -38.3% | 10.3% | 4% | Context only | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 507 reported | -44.8% | 8.1% | 4% | Context only | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 914 reported | 60.7% | 78.2% | 30% | 40% |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.2B HKD (≈$1.3B) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 3.3B HKD (≈$428M) | 98 | ||
| 1 | 134.4B HKD (≈$17.2B) | 98 | 44 | |
| 1 | 65.1B HKD (≈$8.3B) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 6.0B HKD (≈$762M) | 98 | ||
| 877 | 625M USD | 4 | ||
| 877 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.1B USD |
| 4 |
| 5 |
| 877 | 77.0B USD | 4 | 47 |
| 877 | 19.85T IDR (≈$1.2B) | 4 | 9 |
| 877 | 2.8B USD | 4 |
| 877 | 288M AUD (≈$190M) | 4 | 32 |
| 877 | 1.4B USD | 4 | 41 |
| 877 | 131.49T IDR (≈$8.2B) | 4 | 59 |
| 886 | 21.5B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 3 |