Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Vipshop Holdings Limited
How Vipshop Holdings Limited stacks up
VIPS · against 258 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Profitability
90/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #42 of 259 · scores higher than 84% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score43 peers with a profitability score of 90–100, including VIPS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 90?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Mainly thanks to its return on invested capital and return on assets, which are stronger than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
- Operating margin is close to the peer norm. Operating margin: 7.7% vs peer median 6.4%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 88% of peers. Return on assets: 9.2% vs peer median 3.3%
- a higher return on invested capital: stronger than 93% of peers. Return on invested capital: 35.7% vs peer median 7.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VIPS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VIPS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 246 reported | 35.7% | 10.3% | 87% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 259 reported | 7.7% | 9.3% | 41% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 248 reported | 9.2% | 4.7% | 81% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 235 reported | 23.5% | 12.3% | 75% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 261 reported | 23.4% | 31.3% | 37% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VIPS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.48T JPY (≈$10.1B) | 100 | 96 | |
| 1 | 358.0B INR (≈$4.3B) | 100 | 73 | |
| 3 | 981.2B JPY (≈$6.7B) | 99 | 67 | |
| 3 | 106.7B TWD (≈$3.3B) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 4.6B USD | 99 | 80 | |
| 38 | 3.8B USD | 91 | 62 | |
| 38 | 3.9B USD | 91 | 56 | |
| 38 | 4.2B USD | 91 | 56 | |
| 42 | 7.4B USD | 90 | 64 | |
| 42 | 6.2B USD | 90 | 69 | |
| 44 | 5.6B USD | 89 | 69 | |
| 44 | 8.9B USD | 89 | 53 | |
| 44 | 5.6B USD | 89 | 47 | |
| 47 | 7.29T KRW (≈$5.2B) | 88 | 65 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score