Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Vinci Compass Investments Ltd.
How Vinci Compass Investments Ltd. stacks up
VINP · against 84 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Valuation
66/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #34 of 85 · scores higher than 60% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score9 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including VINP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 66?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its EBITDA yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 61% of peers. Earnings yield: 7.9% vs peer median 5.7%
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 73% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.3% vs peer median 6.9%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VINP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VINP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 148 reported | 7.9% | 5.2% | 58% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 54 reported | 11.3% | 7.6% | 74% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 59 reported | Not reported | 9.9% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 145 reported | 67.4% | 110.7% | 25% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VINP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 498M USD | 100 | 90 | |
| 1 | 641M USD | 100 | 74 | |
| 3 | 827M USD | 99 | 62 | |
| 3 | 659M USD | 99 | 72 | |
| 5 | 1.1B CAD (≈$782M) | 98 | 59 | |
| 31 | 501M EUR (≈$551M) | 70 | 58 | |
| 32 | 6.7B SEK (≈$667M) | 69 | 74 | |
| 33 | 742M USD | 68 | 39 | |
| 34 | 20.0B MXN (≈$1.1B) | 66 | 68 | |
| 34 | 566M USD | 66 | 75 | |
| 36 | 1.3B MYR (≈$289M) | 65 | 49 | |
| 37 | 453M EUR (≈$499M) | 64 | 39 | |
| 38 | 577M EUR (≈$635M) | 63 | 67 | |
| 39 | 433M USD | 61 | 46 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score