Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Viavi Solutions Inc.
How Viavi Solutions Inc. stacks up
VIAV · against 1,666 other Technology companies
Valuation
25/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #1,243 of 1,667 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score167 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including VIAV · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 25?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Technology peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -0.4% vs peer median 2.2%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 65% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 1.1% vs peer median 2.7%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 2.2% vs peer median 4.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = VIAV, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | VIAV | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,632 reported | -0.4% | 2.3% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,698 reported | 3.7% | 4.3% | 45% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 725 reported | 1.1% | 2.7% | 35% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,634 reported | 19.5% | 33.4% | 28% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around VIAV| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 328.2B KRW (≈$236M) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 252.6B KRW (≈$182M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 1 | 443.2B KRW (≈$319M) | 100 | 64 | |
| 1 | 569.9B KRW (≈$410M) | 100 | 88 | |
| 1 | 111M MYR (≈$24M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1,243 | 671M USD | 25 | 31 | |
| 1,243 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score