Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
VFS · against 220 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #215 of 221 · scores higher than 2% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score8 peers with a valuation score of 0–9, including VFS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
| Metric | VFS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 218 reported | Not reported | 5.0% | — | — | 30% |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 224 reported | Not reported | 9.1% | — | — | 50% |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 118 reported | Not reported | 6.3% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 220 reported | Not reported | 34.3% | — | — | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6.2B USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 51.9B CNY (≈$7.3B) | 98 | 64 | |
| 3 | 7.7B USD | 97 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.2B USD | 97 | 60 | |
| 5 | 5.3B CAD (≈$3.9B) | 96 | 71 | |
| 213 | 8.8B USD | 12 | 55 | |
| 214 | 11.5B EUR (≈$12.7B) | 9 | 28 | |
| 215 | 8.6B USD | 6 | 41 | |
| 215 | 8.0B USD | 6 | 26 | |
| 215 | 7.5B USD | 6 | 25 | |
| 218 | 33.1B CNY (≈$4.6B) | 5 | 42 | |
| 219 | 40.8B CNY (≈$5.7B) | 0 | 31 | |
| 219 | 27.1B CNY (≈$3.8B) | 0 | 35 | |
| 219 | 3.9B EUR (≈$4.3B) | 0 | 9 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score