Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Utz Brands, Inc.
How Utz Brands, Inc. stacks up
UTZ · against 798 other Consumer Defensive companies
Valuation
15/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #676 of 799 · scores higher than 15% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score80 peers with a valuation score of 10–19, including UTZ · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 15?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield, EBITDA yield and free cash flow yield, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- Negative (a loss or cash outflow), so it counts as zero whatever the share price. Earnings yield: -1.4% vs peer median 4.5%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 82% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.4% vs peer median 8.7%
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.5% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UTZ, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UTZ | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 771 reported | -2.3% | 4.5% | 13% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 812 reported | 3.2% | 8.9% | 18% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 312 reported | 2.5% | 6.3% | 24% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 767 reported | 55.0% | 54.4% | 51% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UTZ| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 399.1B KRW (≈$287M) | 100 | 72 | |
| 1 | 242.6B KRW (≈$175M) | 100 | 70 | |
| 1 | 3.6B MYR (≈$796M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 101M SGD (≈$77M) | 100 | 89 | |
| 5 | 456M HKD (≈$58M) | 98 | 70 | |
| 676 | 2.0B CNY (≈$282M) | 15 | 41 | |
| 676 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score