Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
How United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. stacks up
USLM · against 1,320 other Basic Materials companies
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #747 of 1,321 · scores higher than 43% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score132 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including USLM · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 62% of peers. EBITDA yield: 6.0% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.9% vs peer median 3.6%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 2.6% vs peer median 2.6%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = USLM, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | USLM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 1,281 reported | 3.9% | 3.8% | 50% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 1,352 reported | 6.0% | 8.6% | 38% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 409 reported | 2.6% | 2.6% | 50% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 1,275 reported | 20.1% | 61.0% | 11% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around USLM| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 577.1B KRW (≈$416M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 219M MYR (≈$48M) | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 63M MYR (≈$14M) | 100 | 68 | |
| 1 | 1.39T ARS (≈$1.4B) | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 224.2B CLP (≈$247M) | 100 | 47 | |
| 747 | 325M GBP (≈$423M) | 43 | 37 | |
| 747 | 6.2B EUR (≈$6.8B) | 43 | 43 | |
| 747 | 22.7B USD | 43 | 65 | |
| 747 | 301M USD | 43 | 66 | |
| 747 | 3.5B USD | 43 | 76 | |
| 761 | 53.7B CNY (≈$7.5B) | 42 | 46 | |
| 761 | 4.6B CNY (≈$644M) | 42 | 37 | |
| 761 | 2.6B CNY (≈$357M) | 42 | 43 | |
| 761 | 155.1B TWD (≈$4.8B) | 42 | 34 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score