Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to US Foods Holding Corp.
How US Foods Holding Corp. stacks up
USFD · against 820 other Consumer Defensive companies
Profitability
47/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #432 of 821 · scores higher than 47% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score82 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including USFD · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 47?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Defensive companies.A mix: stronger return on assets, but weaker operating margin than most Consumer Defensive peers.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 75% of peers. Operating margin: 3.1% vs peer median 7.6%
- Return on invested capital is close to the peer norm. Return on invested capital: 10.5% vs peer median 7.7%
- a higher return on assets: stronger than 61% of peers. Return on assets: 5.1% vs peer median 4.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = USFD, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | USFD | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 761 reported | 10.5% | 7.7% | 60% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 817 reported | 3.1% | 7.6% | 25% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 784 reported | 5.1% | 4.0% | 61% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 770 reported | 16.4% | 8.3% | 77% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 824 reported | 17.6% | 32.0% | 20% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around USFD| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 100 | 67 | |
| 1 | 229.1B INR (≈$2.7B) | 100 | 70 | |
| 3 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 99 | 77 | |
| 3 | 4.0B MYR (≈$881M) | 99 | 71 | |
| 3 | 162.4B CNY (≈$22.7B) | 99 | 81 | |
| 432 | 636.1B CLP (≈$700M) | 47 | 54 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score