Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
USAU · against 1,354 other Basic Materials companies
Ranked #46 of 1,355 · scores higher than 97% of peers · safety percentile 97
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)136 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including USAU · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Basic Materials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | USAU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,322 reported | 0.00× | 0.36× | 96% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,325 reported | 0.94 | 0.66 | 28% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,285 reported | 37.16× | 1.77× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 26.3B INR (≈$316M) | 100 | 73 | |
| 2 | 226M USD | 100 | 68 | |
| 3 | 6.4B CNY (≈$902M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 3 | 7.6B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 99 | 56 | |
| 3 | 17.3B CNY (≈$2.4B) | 99 | 44 | |
| 42 | 897M CAD (≈$655M) | 97 | ||
| 43 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 5.1B CNY (≈$710M) |
| 97 |
| 42 |
| 44 | 13.6B TWD (≈$421M) | 97 | 72 |
| 45 | 9.2B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 97 | 64 |
| 46 | 166M USD | 97 | 36 |
| 47 | 122M AUD (≈$80M) | 97 | 59 |
| 48 | 5.3B USD | 97 | 91 |
| 49 | 8.3B TWD (≈$259M) | 96 | 68 |
| 50 | 1.1B USD | 96 | 35 |