Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UNTY · against 908 other Banks & Insurance companies
Ranked #224 of 909 · scores higher than 75% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score90 peers with a profitability score of 70–79, including UNTY · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its return on equity and return on assets, which are stronger than most Banks & Insurance peers.
| Metric | UNTY | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 784 reported | 13.3% | 10.4% | 63% | Context only | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 136 reported | Not reported | 14.5% | — | — | Context only |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 913 reported | 1.8% | 1.2% | 74% | 50% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 904 reported | 17.0% | 11.2% | 82% | 50% | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 951 reported | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0% | Context only |
Metrics with no weight are context only: for banks, brokers and insurers, free cash flow, EBITDA, gross margin and current ratio mostly reflect trading and funding flows, not the health of the business.
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Profitability | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 192.8B JPY (≈$1.3B) | 98 | 47 | |
| 1 | 98.7B JPY (≈$671M) | 98 | 43 | |
| 1 | 66.1B USD | 98 | 93 | |
| 1 | 79.2B BRL (≈$14.3B) | 98 | 61 | |
| 1 | 275.9B INR (≈$3.3B) | 98 | 38 | |
| 224 | 2.3B EUR (≈$2.6B) | 75 | 51 | |
| 224 | 264.4B MXN (≈$14.3B) | 75 | 53 | |
| 224 | 4.2B USD | 75 | 56 | |
| 224 | 834.8B INR (≈$10.0B) | 75 | 68 | |
| 224 | 581M USD | 75 | 62 | |
| 233 | 77.7B SAR (≈$21.0B) | 74 | 65 | |
| 233 | 64.1B SAR (≈$17.3B) | 74 | 54 | |
| 233 | 843M USD | 74 | 58 | |
| 233 | 510.9B ZAR (≈$28.1B) | 74 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score