Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UNFI · against 801 other Consumer Defensive companies
Ranked #667 of 802 · scores higher than 17% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)80 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including UNFI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UNFI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 784 reported | 1.87× | 0.44× | 9% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 792 reported | 0.81 | 0.32 | 11% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 788 reported | 1.29× | 1.53× | 39% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 159.9B JPY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 74 | |
| 1 | 20.8B THB (≈$583M) | 100 | 63 | |
| 1 | 9.30T IDR (≈$577M) | 100 | 82 | |
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 5 | 968M MYR (≈$213M) | 100 | 94 | |
| 663 | 426M USD | 17 | 48 | |
| 664 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 33.7B USD |
| 17 |
| 51 |
| 665 | 3.4B CAD (≈$2.5B) | 17 | 49 |
| 666 | 7.2B THB (≈$201M) | 17 | 21 |
| 667 | 2.7B USD | 17 | 42 |
| 668 | 12.7B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 17 | 15 |
| 669 | 2.4B CNY (≈$338M) | 17 | 11 |
| 670 | 129M EUR (≈$142M) | 16 | 37 |
| 671 | 2.2B CNY (≈$313M) | 16 | 58 |