Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UNFI · against 181 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #159 of 182 · scores higher than 13% of peers · safety percentile 17
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)16 peers with a safety percentile of 10–19, including UNFI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity, beta and current ratio, which are weaker than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UNFI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 177 reported | 1.87× | 0.31× | 5% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 180 reported | 0.81 | 0.37 | 10% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 175 reported | 1.29× | 1.80× | 29% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 5 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 155 | 2.71T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 18 | 52 | |
| 156 | 5.4B SAR (≈$1.5B) | 18 | 47 | |
| 157 | 24.66T IDR (≈$1.5B) | 17 | 64 | |
| 158 | 3.4B CAD (≈$2.5B) | 17 | 49 | |
| 159 | 2.7B USD | 17 | 42 | |
| 160 | 12.7B CNY (≈$1.8B) | 17 | 15 | |
| 161 | 50.5B THB (≈$1.4B) | 16 | 35 | |
| 162 | 3.8B USD | 15 | 50 | |
| 163 | 2.4B GBP (≈$3.1B) | 14 | 36 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score