Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Universal Health Realty Income Trust
How Universal Health Realty Income Trust stacks up
UHT · against 246 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #130 of 247 · scores higher than 46% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score23 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including UHT · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Its metrics sit close to the Real Estate norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 0.8% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.1% vs peer median 3.8%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 7.3% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UHT, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UHT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 250 reported | 0.8% | 2.6% | 43% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 143 reported | 7.3% | 9.8% | 46% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 245 reported | 2.1% | 2.8% | 46% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UHT| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 2 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 2 | 71.4B JPY (≈$486M) | 99 | 73 | |
| 2 | 517M USD | 99 | 79 | |
| 2 | 2.4B BRL (≈$428M) | 99 | 92 | |
| 130 | 3.5B CNY (≈$484M) | 44 | 19 | |
| 130 | 522M USD | 44 | 30 | |
| 130 | 735M USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 130 | 3.9B SEK (≈$386M) | 44 | 42 | |
| 130 | 530M USD | 44 | 62 | |
| 135 | 1.0B CAD (≈$736M) | 43 | 44 | |
| 136 | 18.8B THB (≈$527M) | 42 | 68 | |
| 136 | 338M EUR (≈$371M) | 42 | 53 | |
| 136 | 480M USD | 42 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score