Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UFPT · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #789 of 1,373 · scores higher than 43% of peers · safety percentile 43
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)137 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including UFPT · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Healthcare norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UFPT | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.29× | 0.24× | 45% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.07 | 0.53 | 22% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 3.00× | 2.62× | 56% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 785 | 166.5B SEK (≈$16.6B) | 43 | 49 | |
| 786 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.1B CNY (≈$579M) |
| 43 |
| 34 |
| 787 | 64.3B KRW (≈$46M) | 43 | 24 |
| 788 | 443.6B KRW (≈$319M) | 43 | 44 |
| 789 | 2.2B USD | 43 | 61 |
| 790 | 4.6B CNY (≈$645M) | 42 | 17 |
| 791 | 1.5B EUR (≈$1.7B) | 42 | 60 |
| 792 | 71.0B HKD (≈$9.1B) | 42 | 54 |
| 793 | 21.1B HKD (≈$2.7B) | 42 | 67 |