Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to UDR, Inc.
How UDR, Inc. stacks up
UDR · against 80 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Growth
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #11 of 81 · scores higher than 85% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score13 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including UDR · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.5% vs peer median 3.0%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 94% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 308.2% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UDR, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UDR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 82 reported | 1.5% | 5.2% | 23% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 65 reported | 308.2% | 15.4% | 91% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 80 reported | 2.5% | 6.1% | 20% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UDR| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 2 | 7.60T CLP (≈$8.4B) | 99 | 86 | |
| 3 | 11.7B USD | 98 | 49 | |
| 3 | 13.7B USD | 98 | 70 | |
| 5 | 7.2B USD | 97 | 34 | |
| 8 | 54.5B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 53 | |
| 8 | 11.3B USD | 94 | 44 | |
| 8 | 8.7B USD | 94 | 77 | |
| 11 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 92 | 76 | |
| 11 | 13.2B USD | 92 | 63 | |
| 11 | 12.9B EUR (≈$14.2B) | 92 | 63 | |
| 14 | 136.3B MXN (≈$7.4B) | 89 | 63 | |
| 15 | 12.0B USD | 88 | 61 | |
| 16 | 7.2B EUR (≈$7.9B) | 85 | 63 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score