Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to BXP, Inc.
How BXP, Inc. stacks up
BXP · against 730 other Real Estate companies
Growth
94/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #42 of 731 · scores higher than 94% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score77 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including BXP · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 94?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, which is stronger than most Real Estate peers.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 1.9% vs peer median 3.0%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 3.2% vs peer median 3.8%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 100% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 5832.6% vs peer median 11.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = BXP, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | BXP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 741 reported | 1.9% | 3.0% | 46% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 464 reported | 5832.6% | 11.1% | 100% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 718 reported | 3.2% | 3.8% | 47% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around BXP| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.1B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 65.5B INR (≈$786M) | 100 | 57 | |
| 1 | 6.3B THB (≈$176M) | 100 | 77 | |
| 1 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 60 | |
| 5 | 3.1B CNY (≈$440M) | 99 | 67 | |
| 34 | 11.0B DKK (≈$1.7B) | 95 | 49 | |
| 34 | 440M USD | 95 | 64 | |
| 42 | 44.3B TWD (≈$1.4B) | 94 | 94 | |
| 42 | 54.5B BRL (≈$9.8B) | 94 | 53 | |
| 42 | 11.3B USD | 94 | 44 | |
| 42 | 8.7B USD | 94 | 77 | |
| 42 | 7.8B BRL (≈$1.4B) | 94 | ||
| 42 | 332M USD | 94 | 71 | |
| 42 | 5.6B TRY (≈$168M) | 94 | 90 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score