Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
UAVS · against 1,697 other Technology companies
Ranked #268 of 1,698 · scores higher than 84% of peers · safety percentile 84
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)170 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including UAVS · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | UAVS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,616 reported | 0.11× | 0.26× | 65% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,632 reported | 2.85 | 0.84 | 2% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,690 reported | 6.43× | 1.83× | 93% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.0B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 52.4B JPY (≈$356M) | 100 | 67 | |
| 3 | 2.6B CNY (≈$364M) | 100 | 56 | |
| 4 | 4.06T KRW (≈$2.9B) | 100 | 97 | |
| 5 | 213M USD | 100 | 37 | |
| 264 | 888.4B TWD (≈$27.5B) | 85 | 73 | |
| 265 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 4.4B CNY (≈$610M) |
| 84 |
| 45 |
| 266 | 3.7B USD | 84 | 71 |
| 267 | 72.9B JPY (≈$496M) | 84 | 82 |
| 268 | 26M USD | 84 | 26 |
| 269 | 132.9B JPY (≈$904M) | 84 | 87 |
| 270 | 53.8B JPY (≈$366M) | 84 | 77 |
| 271 | 6.3B CNY (≈$883M) | 84 | 50 |
| 272 | 343.0B JPY (≈$2.3B) | 84 | 66 |