Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to United Airlines Holdings, Inc.
How United Airlines Holdings, Inc. stacks up
UAL · against 133 other Industrials companies of similar size
Growth
58/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #65 of 134 · scores higher than 52% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score17 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including UAL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 58?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 5.3% vs peer median 7.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 64% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 7.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 65% of peers. Revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 4.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = UAL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | UAL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 135 reported | 8.5% | 7.1% | 57% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 119 reported | 5.3% | 9.0% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 133 reported | 7.3% | 6.3% | 58% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around UAL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 63.0B USD | 100 | 55 | |
| 2 | 22.7B USD | 96 | 41 | |
| 3 | 63.3B CAD (≈$46.2B) | 95 | 56 | |
| 3 | 20.6B USD | 95 | 61 | |
| 3 | 51.7B USD | 95 | 58 | |
| 61 | 5.85T JPY (≈$39.8B) | 60 | 62 | |
| 61 | 224.6B SEK (≈$22.5B) | 60 | 56 | |
| 61 | 18.4B USD | 60 | 57 | |
| 64 | 6.21T JPY (≈$42.2B) | 59 | 53 | |
| 65 | 34.8B USD | 58 | 52 | |
| 66 | 28.3B USD | 57 | 64 | |
| 67 | 22.4B USD | 56 | 38 | |
| 68 | 35.1B EUR (≈$38.6B) | 55 | 50 | |
| 68 | 31.3B EUR (≈$34.4B) | 55 | 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score