Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tyler Technologies, Inc.
How Tyler Technologies, Inc. stacks up
TYL · against 178 other Technology companies of similar size
Growth
53/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #120 of 179 · scores higher than 33% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score25 peers with a growth score of 50–59, including TYL · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 53?
Weighted metrics compared with all Technology companies.Its metrics sit close to the Technology norm.
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 8.2% vs peer median 8.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 11.8% vs peer median 11.1%
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 62% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 8.5% vs peer median 4.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TYL, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TYL | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 181 reported | 8.2% | 16.2% | 29% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 157 reported | 11.8% | 19.0% | 41% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 177 reported | 8.5% | 10.4% | 43% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TYL| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.4B USD | 100 | 79 | |
| 2 | 835.6B TWD (≈$25.9B) | 98 | 80 | |
| 2 | 101.7B CNY (≈$14.2B) | 98 | 63 | |
| 2 | 983.8B TWD (≈$30.5B) | 98 | 65 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 98 | 65 | |
| 115 | 10.4B GBP (≈$13.6B) | 55 | 52 | |
| 118 | 14.4B USD | 54 | 59 | |
| 118 | 11.9B USD | 54 | 55 | |
| 120 | 66.3B CNY (≈$9.3B) | 53 | 32 | |
| 120 | 16.6B USD | 53 | 51 | |
| 122 | 14.5B USD | 52 | 68 | |
| 122 | 13.6B USD | 52 | 52 | |
| 122 | 13.3B USD | 52 | 76 | |
| 125 | 11.3B USD | 51 | 68 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score