Ranked #57 of 94 · scores higher than 40% of peers · safety percentile 34
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)
11 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TY · Click a bar to see the companies
Why “Moderate relative risk”?
The measures below combine into a safety percentile of 34 among Financial Services companies. It is relative: 67 or more is lower relative risk, 33–66 moderate, below 33 higher.
Its metrics sit close to the Financial Services norm.
▼fewer short-term assets to cover bills due within a year: weaker than 66% of peers. Current ratio: 1.28× vs peer median 2.02×
▼a share price that has swung more with the market: weaker than 64% of peers. Beta: 0.85 vs peer median 0.70
●Debt / equity is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TY, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.
Metric
TY
Peer median
Better than
Position among peers
Weight
Debt / equityLower is better · 83 reported
Not reported
0.57×
—
—
33%
BetaLower is better · 99 reported
0.85
0.65
32%
33%
Current ratioHigher is better · 89 reported
1.28×
2.35×
34%
33%
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
