Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
GBDC · against 398 other Financial Services companies
Ranked #269 of 399 · scores higher than 33% of peers · safety percentile 33
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)40 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including GBDC · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its current ratio and debt / equity, which are weaker than most Financial Services peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | GBDC | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 349 reported | 1.22× | 0.57× | 34% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 394 reported | 0.44 | 0.67 | 70% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 372 reported | 0.14× | 2.04× | 3% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 344M MYR (≈$76M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 2 | 1.0B AUD (≈$674M) | 100 | ||
| 3 | 24.8B JPY (≈$168M) | 99 | 25 | |
| 4 | 0M MYR (≈$0M) | 99 | ||
| 5 | 4.0B SEK (≈$400M) | 99 | 63 | |
| 265 | 6.5B THB (≈$182M) | 34 | 56 | |
| 266 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 742M USD |
| 33 |
| 39 |
| 267 | 644M USD | 33 | 61 |
| 268 | 9.2B HKD (≈$1.2B) | 33 | 39 |
| 269 | 3.3B USD | 33 | 57 |
| 270 | 345M USD | 32 | 21 |
| 271 | 96.0B USD | 32 | 48 |
| 272 | 97.2B USD | 32 | 44 |
| 273 | 16.6B INR (≈$199M) | 32 | 14 |