Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Ternium S.A.
How Ternium S.A. stacks up
TX · against 1,333 other Basic Materials companies
Profitability
44/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #741 of 1,334 · scores higher than 44% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score133 peers with a profitability score of 40–49, including TX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 44?
Weighted metrics compared with all Basic Materials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Basic Materials norm.
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 62% of peers. Operating margin: 4.6% vs peer median 7.6%
- Return on invested capital is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- Return on assets is close to the peer norm. Return on assets: 3.1% vs peer median 2.5%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 1,260 reported | Not reported | 6.7% | — | — | 33% |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 1,304 reported | 4.6% | 7.6% | 38% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 1,270 reported | 3.1% | 2.5% | 56% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 1,254 reported | 4.4% | 5.5% | 46% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 1,372 reported | 17.7% | 21.5% | 42% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TXScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score