Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TWIN · against 778 other Industrials companies of similar size
Ranked #277 of 779 · scores higher than 65% of peers · safety percentile 75
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)95 peers with a safety percentile of 70–79, including TWIN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TWIN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 744 reported | 0.23× | 0.33× | 58% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 753 reported | 0.67 | 0.52 | 32% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 768 reported | 2.35× | 1.81× | 67% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 209M USD | 100 | 46 | |
| 5 | 402M USD | 100 | 39 | |
| 273 | 320M EUR (≈$352M) | 75 | 65 | |
| 274 | 1.8B CNY (≈$253M) | 75 | 49 | |
| 275 | 7.8B TWD (≈$243M) | 75 | 53 | |
| 276 | 3.3B CNY (≈$461M) | 75 | 26 | |
| 277 | 364M USD | 75 | 71 | |
| 278 | 5.0B CNY (≈$703M) | 75 | 38 | |
| 279 | 2.0B CNY (≈$286M) | 75 | 41 | |
| 280 | 14.6B TWD (≈$453M) | 75 | 85 | |
| 281 | 3.49T IDR (≈$216M) | 74 | 80 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score