Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TWFG, Inc.
How TWFG, Inc. stacks up
TWFG · against 98 other Financial Services companies of similar size
Growth
92/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #8 of 99 · scores higher than 92% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score12 peers with a growth score of 90–100, including TWFG · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 92?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth, revenue growth and 3-year revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- faster revenue growth over three years: stronger than 71% of peers. 3-year revenue growth: 16.5% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 83% of peers. Revenue growth: 34.7% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 2888.1% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TWFG, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TWFG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 114 reported | 34.7% | 1.9% | 85% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 72 reported | 2888.1% | 4.8% | 100% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 84 reported | 16.5% | 5.9% | 78% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TWFG| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 2 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 4 | 6.7B SEK (≈$667M) | 96 | 74 | |
| 4 | 249M USD | 96 | 31 | |
| 6 | 461M USD | 93 | 59 | |
| 6 | 481M EUR (≈$529M) | 93 | ||
| 8 | 370M USD | 92 | 85 | |
| 8 | 565M CAD (≈$413M) | 92 | 63 | |
| 10 | 45.4B JPY (≈$309M) | 90 | 79 | |
| 10 | 259M USD | 90 | 71 | |
| 10 | 566M USD | 90 | 75 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score