Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TSLA · against 1 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #1 of 2 · scores higher than 100% of peers · safety percentile 35
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)1 peers with a safety percentile of 30–39, including TSLA · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Consumer Cyclical peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TSLA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2 reported | 0.18× | 0.32× | 100% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2 reported | 1.84 | 1.65 | 0% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2 reported | 1.94× | 1.49× | 100% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.49T USD | 35 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2.80T USD | 27 | 58 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score