Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TSEM · against 171 other Technology companies of similar size
Ranked #4 of 172 · scores higher than 98% of peers · safety percentile 94
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)10 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including TSEM · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Technology peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TSEM | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 164 reported | 0.05× | 0.36× | 80% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 165 reported | 0.89 | 1.07 | 65% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 171 reported | 4.91× | 1.62× | 94% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.60T JPY (≈$17.7B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 23.2B USD | 97 | 65 | |
| 3 | 17.5B USD | 95 | 93 | |
| 4 | 18.4B USD | 94 | 56 | |
| 5 | 183.1B CNY (≈$25.6B) | 94 | 77 | |
| 6 | 10.7B USD | 93 | 59 | |
| 7 | 9.6B USD | 93 | 75 | |
| 8 | 12.2B USD | 91 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score