Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TSCO · against 125 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Ranked #61 of 126 · scores higher than 52% of peers · safety percentile 46
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)12 peers with a safety percentile of 40–49, including TSCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TSCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 124 reported | 2.49× | 0.70× | 12% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 127 reported | 0.47 | 0.80 | 74% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 122 reported | 1.33× | 1.47× | 45% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.75T JPY (≈$11.9B) | 97 | 51 | |
| 2 | 9.5B CHF (≈$10.9B) | 96 | 37 | |
| 3 | 112.0B CNY (≈$15.7B) | 95 | 53 | |
| 4 | 3.98T JPY (≈$27.1B) | 94 | 74 | |
| 5 | 16.1B USD | 93 | 66 | |
| 57 | 75.5B CNY (≈$10.6B) | 52 | 56 | |
| 58 | 1.93T JPY (≈$13.1B) | 49 | 53 | |
| 59 | 2.90T INR (≈$34.8B) | 49 | 67 | |
| 60 | 9.8B USD | 48 | 47 | |
| 61 | 18.3B USD | 46 | 55 | |
| 62 | 13.0B USD | 46 | 68 | |
| 63 | 24.6B USD | 43 | 56 | |
| 64 | 114.3B HKD (≈$14.6B) | 43 | 70 | |
| 65 | 16.2B USD | 43 | 62 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score