Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tractor Supply Company
How Tractor Supply Company stacks up
TSCO · against 127 other Consumer Cyclical companies of similar size
Growth
42/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #103 of 128 · scores higher than 20% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score15 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TSCO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Consumer Cyclical companies.Its metrics sit close to the Consumer Cyclical norm.
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: -5.3% vs peer median 4.2%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 2.2% vs peer median 4.3%
- Revenue growth is close to the peer norm. Revenue growth: 4.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TSCO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TSCO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 128 reported | 4.0% | 8.4% | 30% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 114 reported | -5.3% | 9.7% | 32% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 127 reported | 2.2% | 10.1% | 17% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TSCO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 158.6B CNY (≈$22.2B) | 100 | 60 | |
| 1 | 184.4B HKD (≈$23.6B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 17.7B USD | 99 | 54 | |
| 3 | 15.2B USD | 99 | 57 | |
| 3 | 9.3B USD | 99 | 43 | |
| 98 | 11.8B USD | 44 | 73 | |
| 98 | 10.2B USD | 44 | 44 | |
| 101 | 4.66T JPY (≈$31.7B) | 43 | 61 | |
| 101 | 15.2B USD | 43 | 36 | |
| 103 | 18.3B USD | 42 | 55 | |
| 104 | 303.1B TWD (≈$9.4B) | 41 | 41 | |
| 104 | 1.72T JPY (≈$11.7B) | 41 | 51 | |
| 106 | 11.0B EUR (≈$12.1B) | 39 | 42 | |
| 106 | 9.5B USD | 39 | 66 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score