Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tenaris S.A.
How Tenaris S.A. stacks up
TS · against 385 other Energy companies
Growth
42/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #223 of 386 · scores higher than 42% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score38 peers with a growth score of 40–49, including TS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 42?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Its metrics sit close to the Energy norm.
- slower revenue growth over the last year: weaker than 63% of peers. Revenue growth: -4.3% vs peer median 0.5%
- Earnings per share growth is close to the peer norm. Earnings per share growth: 2.9% vs peer median 1.1%
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 0.6% vs peer median -1.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 394 reported | -4.3% | 0.5% | 37% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 292 reported | 2.9% | 1.0% | 53% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 383 reported | 0.6% | -1.3% | 57% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.2B USD | 100 | 89 | |
| 2 | 203M MYR (≈$45M) | 99 | 62 | |
| 2 | 4.3B GBP (≈$5.6B) | 99 | 75 | |
| 2 | 254M USD | 99 | 88 | |
| 2 | 1.2B USD | 99 | 48 | |
| 219 | 150.0B THB (≈$4.2B) | 43 | 37 | |
| 223 | 34.2B MYR (≈$7.5B) | 42 | 58 | |
| 223 | 2.7B USD | 42 | 43 | |
| 223 | 5.7B USD | 42 | 52 | |
| 223 | 29.1B USD | 42 | 58 | |
| 227 | 4.5B HKD (≈$576M) | 41 | 19 | |
| 227 | 448M USD | 41 | 42 | |
| 227 | 3.9B USD | 41 | 62 | |
| 227 | 28.4B USD | 41 | 48 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score