Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Tenaris S.A.
How Tenaris S.A. stacks up
TS · against 42 other Energy companies of similar size
Valuation
28/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #38 of 43 · scores higher than 12% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score4 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 28?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 86% of peers. EBITDA yield: 5.0% vs peer median 12.1%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.8% vs peer median 6.2%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 6.6% vs peer median 5.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 45 reported | 6.5% | 7.2% | 41% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 42 reported | 5.0% | 15.2% | 5% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 28 reported | 5.9% | 6.4% | 33% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 40 reported | 29.2% | 52.4% | 13% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 571.7B THB (≈$16.0B) | 95 | 62 | |
| 2 | 229.8B NOK (≈$21.8B) | 89 | 55 | |
| 3 | 16.7B USD | 88 | 70 | |
| 3 | 20.8B USD | 88 | 83 | |
| 3 | 1.96T INR (≈$23.5B) | 88 | 70 | |
| 34 | 58.0B USD | 34 | 48 | |
| 35 | 29.1B AUD (≈$19.2B) | 33 | 39 | |
| 36 | 53.9B USD | 31 | 42 | |
| 36 | 26.0B USD | 31 | 63 | |
| 38 | 29.1B USD | 28 | 58 | |
| 39 | 286.67T IDR (≈$17.8B) | 27 | 62 | |
| 40 | 28.7B USD | 25 | 37 | |
| 41 | 15.9B USD | 23 | 59 | |
| 42 | 22.9B USD | 10 | 72 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score