Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TechnipFMC plc
How TechnipFMC plc stacks up
FTI · against 386 other Energy companies
Valuation
31/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #266 of 387 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score39 peers with a valuation score of 30–39, including FTI · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 31?
Weighted metrics compared with all Energy companies.Mainly because of its EBITDA yield, which is weaker than most Energy peers.
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 77% of peers. EBITDA yield: 8.1% vs peer median 12.1%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 4.5% vs peer median 5.2%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 6.0% vs peer median 6.2%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = FTI, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | FTI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 384 reported | 4.8% | 5.8% | 43% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 390 reported | 7.9% | 12.4% | 23% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 249 reported | 6.1% | 6.0% | 53% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 378 reported | 12.8% | 60.0% | 6% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around FTI| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.6B MYR (≈$347M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 2 | 9.94T KRW (≈$7.2B) | 99 | 65 | |
| 2 | 2.2B MYR (≈$487M) | 99 | 60 | |
| 2 | 942M USD | 99 | 69 | |
| 2 | 517M CAD (≈$378M) | 99 | 47 | |
| 262 | 66.8B USD | 32 | 49 | |
| 262 | 1.8B USD | 32 | 61 | |
| 262 | 755M USD | 32 | 41 | |
| 266 | 53.9B USD | 31 | 42 | |
| 266 | 26.0B USD | 31 | 63 | |
| 266 | 7.0B USD | 31 | 36 | |
| 266 | 1.2B USD | 31 | 48 | |
| 270 | 9.6B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 30 | 37 | |
| 270 | 191.9B INR (≈$2.3B) | 30 | 69 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score