Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRVI · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #74 of 1,373 · scores higher than 95% of peers · safety percentile 95
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 90–100, including TRVI · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its current ratio and debt / equity, which are stronger than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRVI | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.00× | 0.24× | 97% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.05 | 0.53 | 23% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 37.28× | 2.62× | 99% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 70 | 593M USD | 95 | 40 | |
| 71 | 6.3B CNY (≈$878M) | 95 | 32 | |
| 72 | 216M USD | 95 | 44 | |
| 73 | 3.2B CNY (≈$449M) | 95 | 35 | |
| 74 | 2.0B USD | 95 | 42 | |
| 75 | 1.8B AUD (≈$1.2B) | 95 | 41 | |
| 76 | 1.6B USD | 95 | ||
| 77 | 7.5B CNY (≈$1.1B) | 94 | 82 | |
| 78 | 1.0B USD | 94 | 32 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score