Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRVG · against 102 other Communication Services companies of similar size
Ranked #42 of 103 · scores higher than 60% of peers · safety percentile 67
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)17 peers with a safety percentile of 60–69, including TRVG · Click a bar to see the companies
Its metrics sit close to the Communication Services norm.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRVG | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 93 reported | 0.17× | 0.23× | 55% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 100 reported | 0.57 | 0.56 | 48% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 99 reported | 1.65× | 1.55× | 53% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 56.0B JPY (≈$381M) | 99 | 55 | |
| 2 | 1.4B HKD (≈$182M) | 99 | 65 | |
| 3 | 1.2B BRL (≈$211M) | 98 | 89 | |
| 4 | 19.5B JPY (≈$133M) | 98 | 71 | |
| 5 | 2.5B HKD (≈$316M) | 97 | 70 | |
| 38 | 31.1B JPY (≈$211M) | 69 | 62 | |
| 39 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 174.5B KRW (≈$126M) |
| 68 |
| 54 |
| 40 | 1.1B HKD (≈$135M) | 68 | 42 |
| 41 | 3.1B HKD (≈$398M) | 67 | 74 |
| 42 | 248M USD | 67 | 58 |
| 43 | 7.9B TWD (≈$244M) | 66 | 73 |
| 44 | 472M USD | 66 | 28 |
| 45 | 210.3B KRW (≈$151M) | 65 | 47 |
| 46 | 1.2B HKD (≈$155M) | 63 | 53 |