Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TransUnion
How TransUnion stacks up
TRU · against 153 other Financial Services companies listed in US-listed
Growth
75/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #45 of 154 · scores higher than 71% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the growth score16 peers with a growth score of 70–79, including TRU · Click a bar to see the companies
Why growth scores 75?
Weighted metrics compared with all Financial Services companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings per share growth and revenue growth, which are stronger than most Financial Services peers.
- 3-year revenue growth is close to the peer norm. 3-year revenue growth: 9.3% vs peer median 10.0%
- faster revenue growth over the last year: stronger than 61% of peers. Revenue growth: 12.4% vs peer median 7.4%
- faster growth in earnings per share: stronger than 87% of peers. Earnings per share growth: 91.5% vs peer median 10.0%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRU, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRU | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue growthHigher is better · 179 reported | 12.4% | 10.5% | 56% | 33% | |
| Earnings per share growthHigher is better · 131 reported | 91.5% | 11.4% | 88% | 33% | |
| 3-year revenue growthHigher is better · 138 reported | 9.3% | 11.5% | 37% | 33% |
Ranking by growth score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRU| Rank | Company | Market cap | Growth | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 883M USD | 99 | 51 | |
| 1 | 322M USD | 99 | 58 | |
| 3 | 601M USD | 98 | 72 | |
| 3 | 843M USD | 98 | ||
| 5 | 282M USD | 97 | ||
| 42 | 644M USD | 77 | 61 | |
| 43 | 910M USD | 76 | 60 | |
| 43 | 23.7B USD | 76 | 59 | |
| 45 | 4.0B USD | 75 | 66 | |
| 45 | 15.1B USD | 75 | 49 | |
| 47 | 190M USD | 74 | 67 | |
| 47 | 4.3B USD | 74 | 70 | |
| 47 | 3.0B USD | 74 | 52 | |
| 50 | 9.6B USD | 73 | 73 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score