Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Triton International Limited
How Triton International Limited stacks up
TRTN-PA · against 2,393 other Industrials companies
Valuation
87/ 100
Near the top of its peers.
Ranked #301 of 2,394 · scores higher than 87% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score239 peers with a valuation score of 80–89, including TRTN-PA · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 87?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- Free cash flow yield is not reported, so it is left out of the score.
- more operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: stronger than 75% of peers. EBITDA yield: 11.7% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 99% of peers. Earnings yield: 32.8% vs peer median 3.8%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRTN-PA, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRTN-PA | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 2,368 reported | 32.8% | 3.8% | 99% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 2,432 reported | 11.7% | 7.0% | 75% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 795 reported | Not reported | 3.7% | — | — | 20% |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 2,381 reported | 67.8% | 50.5% | 63% | Context only |
A metric that is not reported is left out of the score; the other weights are rescaled.
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRTN-PA| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 18.14T KRW (≈$13.1B) | 100 | 76 | |
| 1 | 281.4B KRW (≈$203M) | 100 | 38 | |
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 301 | 21.7B SGD (≈$16.5B) | 87 | 55 | |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score