Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Transcat, Inc.
How Transcat, Inc. stacks up
TRNS · against 939 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
27/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #647 of 940 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score97 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TRNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 27?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its earnings yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 78% of peers. Earnings yield: 0.4% vs peer median 3.8%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 68% of peers. EBITDA yield: 4.2% vs peer median 6.9%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRNS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 941 reported | 0.4% | 3.8% | 24% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 951 reported | 4.4% | 7.1% | 35% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 203 reported | 3.0% | 3.5% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 944 reported | 36.0% | 55.0% | 29% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRNS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 704.9B KRW (≈$508M) | 100 | 66 | |
| 1 | 42.1B TRY (≈$1.3B) | 100 | 58 | |
| 1 | 462M USD | 100 | 86 | |
| 1 | 895M EUR (≈$985M) | 100 | 50 | |
| 1 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 78 | |
| 647 | 7.0B CNY (≈$983M) | 27 | 49 | |
| 647 | 5.7B CNY (≈$801M) | 27 | 40 | |
| 647 | 1.2B NZD (≈$747M) | 27 | 23 | |
| 647 | 536M USD | 27 | 28 | |
| 647 | 838M USD | 27 | 44 | |
| 654 | 5.9B CNY (≈$833M) | 26 | 48 | |
| 654 | 5.3B CNY (≈$746M) | 26 | 42 | |
| 654 | 9.5B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 39 | |
| 654 | 9.5B CNY (≈$1.3B) | 26 | 24 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score