Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Transcat, Inc.
How Transcat, Inc. stacks up
TRNS · against 954 other Industrials companies of similar size
Profitability
23/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #708 of 955 · scores higher than 25% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the profitability score111 peers with a profitability score of 20–29, including TRNS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why profitability scores 23?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly because of its return on assets, operating margin and return on invested capital, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
- a lower return on assets: weaker than 76% of peers. Return on assets: 0.7% vs peer median 3.1%
- a thinner operating margin: weaker than 75% of peers. Operating margin: 3.3% vs peer median 7.7%
- a lower return on invested capital: weaker than 75% of peers. Return on invested capital: 2.3% vs peer median 7.1%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRNS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRNS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return on invested capitalHigher is better · 919 reported | 2.3% | 5.9% | 29% | 33% | |
| Operating marginHigher is better · 953 reported | 3.3% | 7.1% | 26% | 33% | |
| Return on assetsHigher is better · 915 reported | 0.7% | 2.6% | 27% | 33% | |
| Return on equityHigher is better · 906 reported | 1.2% | 6.9% | 25% | Context only | |
| Gross marginHigher is better · 960 reported | 32.5% | 24.1% | 69% | Context only |
Ranking by profitability score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRNSScores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score