Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Terreno Realty Corporation
How Terreno Realty Corporation stacks up
TRNO · against 118 other Real Estate companies of similar size
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #97 of 119 · scores higher than 17% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score14 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including TRNO · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and EBITDA yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 75% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 3.0% vs peer median 6.5%
- less operating profit (EBITDA) for the company's total value: weaker than 72% of peers. EBITDA yield: 3.7% vs peer median 5.4%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 5.3% vs peer median 5.3%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TRNO, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TRNO | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 123 reported | 5.6% | 4.5% | 60% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 115 reported | 3.7% | 5.6% | 16% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 64 reported | 3.0% | 5.0% | 25% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 124 reported | 61.7% | 84.1% | 38% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TRNO| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.3B USD | 93 | 94 | |
| 2 | 1.10T JPY (≈$7.5B) | 90 | 82 | |
| 3 | 10.1B USD | 87 | 53 | |
| 4 | 880.1B JPY (≈$6.0B) | 84 | 64 | |
| 4 | 135.9B MXN (≈$7.3B) | 84 | 76 | |
| 95 | 5.1B USD | 27 | 23 | |
| 96 | 8.8B USD | 25 | 28 | |
| 97 | 12.1B USD | 24 | 43 | |
| 97 | 7.1B CHF (≈$8.2B) | 24 | 40 | |
| 97 | 7.3B USD | 24 | 58 | |
| 100 | 3.2B CHF (≈$3.7B) | 23 | 35 | |
| 100 | 10.8B USD | 23 | 53 | |
| 102 | 7.3B USD | 22 | 23 | |
| 103 | 43.5B HKD (≈$5.6B) | 21 | 42 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score