Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc.
How Equity LifeStyle Properties, Inc. stacks up
ELS · against 662 other Real Estate companies
Valuation
24/ 100
Near the bottom of its peers.
Ranked #501 of 663 · scores higher than 24% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score66 peers with a valuation score of 20–29, including ELS · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 24?
Weighted metrics compared with all Real Estate companies.Mainly because of its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are weaker than most Real Estate peers.
- less free cash flow for the price paid: weaker than 76% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 2.8% vs peer median 6.5%
- lower earnings for the price paid: weaker than 62% of peers. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 5.3%
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 4.1% vs peer median 5.4%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = ELS, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | ELS | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 708 reported | 3.4% | 5.3% | 38% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 681 reported | 5.0% | 5.3% | 44% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 307 reported | 2.8% | 6.8% | 24% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 724 reported | 15.0% | 112.8% | 4% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around ELS| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 227M MYR (≈$50M) | 100 | 80 | |
| 1 | 6.0B BRL (≈$1.1B) | 100 | 91 | |
| 3 | 394M HKD (≈$50M) | 99 | 33 | |
| 3 | 2.9B HKD (≈$365M) | 99 | 76 | |
| 3 | 3.2B HKD (≈$407M) | 99 | 66 | |
| 495 | 903M SGD (≈$686M) | 25 | 40 | |
| 495 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score