Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TRN · against 2,436 other Industrials companies
Ranked #2,324 of 2,437 · scores higher than 5% of peers · safety percentile 5
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)244 peers with a safety percentile of 0–9, including TRN · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly because of its debt / equity and beta, which are weaker than most Industrials peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TRN | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 2,360 reported | 4.68× | 0.41× | 3% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 2,360 reported | 1.34 | 0.61 | 9% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 2,374 reported | 2.17× | 1.62× | 70% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0B CNY (≈$280M) | 100 | 54 | |
| 2 | 79.5B JPY (≈$540M) | 100 | 79 | |
| 3 | 105.3B JPY (≈$716M) | 100 | 85 | |
| 4 | 38M MYR (≈$8M) | 100 | ||
| 4 | 157M USD | 100 | 35 | |
| 2,320 | 1.2B USD | 5 | 28 | |
| 2,321 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 1.60T KRW (≈$1.1B) |
| 5 |
| 13 |
| 2,321 | 2.4B CNY (≈$333M) | 5 | 21 |
| 2,323 | 4.8B CNY (≈$666M) | 5 | 39 |
| 2,324 | 2.4B USD | 5 | 61 |
| 2,325 | 781M CAD (≈$570M) | 5 | 51 |
| 2,326 | 320.9B INR (≈$3.9B) | 5 | 37 |
| 2,327 | 14.2B AUD (≈$9.3B) | 5 | 53 |
| 2,328 | 819M CNY (≈$115M) | 4 | 3 |