Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to Trex Company, Inc.
How Trex Company, Inc. stacks up
TREX · against 454 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
43/ 100
Below the middle of the pack.
Ranked #309 of 455 · scores higher than 31% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score61 peers with a valuation score of 40–49, including TREX · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 43?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Its metrics sit close to the Industrials norm.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 5.8% vs peer median 6.9%
- Earnings yield is close to the peer norm. Earnings yield: 3.5% vs peer median 3.8%
- Free cash flow yield is close to the peer norm. Free cash flow yield: 4.1% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TREX, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TREX | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 3.4% | 4.3% | 35% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 459 reported | 5.8% | 7.8% | 30% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 194 reported | 3.9% | 4.1% | 47% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 449 reported | 19.2% | 40.4% | 18% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TREX| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 302 | 8.2B USD | 44 | 61 | |
| 309 | 1.02T JPY (≈$6.9B) | 43 | 41 | |
| 309 | 4.0B EUR (≈$4.3B) | 43 | 30 | |
| 309 | 29.2B NOK (≈$2.8B) | 43 | 37 | |
| 309 | 5.1B USD | 43 | 52 | |
| 313 | 92.2B TWD (≈$2.9B) | 42 | 52 | |
| 313 | 6.7B USD | 42 | 53 | |
| 313 | 4.3B USD | 42 | 35 | |
| 313 | 5.5B USD | 42 | 52 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score