Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TR · against 178 other Consumer Defensive companies of similar size
Ranked #35 of 179 · scores higher than 81% of peers · safety percentile 81
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)22 peers with a safety percentile of 80–89, including TR · Click a bar to see the companies
Mainly thanks to its debt / equity and current ratio, which are stronger than most Consumer Defensive peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TR | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 174 reported | 0.01× | 0.29× | 90% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 178 reported | 0.41 | 0.36 | 45% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 172 reported | 2.89× | 1.81× | 77% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 60.4B THB (≈$1.7B) | 100 | 65 | |
| 2 | 3.1B USD | 99 | 37 | |
| 3 | 2.74T KRW (≈$2.0B) | 99 | 49 | |
| 4 | 29.8B HKD (≈$3.8B) | 98 | 76 | |
| 5 | 398.9B JPY (≈$2.7B) | 98 | 77 | |
| 31 | 2.33T KRW (≈$1.7B) | 84 | 66 | |
| 32 | 12.5B CNY (≈$1.7B) | 83 | 56 | |
| 33 | 229.1B INR (≈$2.7B) | 83 | 70 | |
| 34 | 2.0B USD | 82 | 71 | |
| 35 | 2.9B USD | 81 | 55 | |
| 36 | 2.7B EUR (≈$3.0B) | 80 | 61 | |
| 37 | 599.0B JPY (≈$4.1B) | 80 | 50 | |
| 38 | 826.9B JPY (≈$5.6B) | 80 | 49 | |
| 39 | 235.8B INR (≈$2.8B) | 79 | 67 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score