Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
TNXP · against 1,372 other Healthcare companies
Ranked #557 of 1,373 · scores higher than 59% of peers · safety percentile 59
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the safety percentile (higher = safer; 67+ earns the lower-risk grade)138 peers with a safety percentile of 50–59, including TNXP · Click a bar to see the companies
A mix: stronger debt / equity and current ratio, but weaker beta than most Healthcare peers.
Risk is relative to the sector, not a bankruptcy probability. Banks and brokers carry high leverage by design, and share buybacks can shrink equity and current assets, which raises debt/equity on paper.
| Metric | TNXP | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Debt / equityLower is better · 1,280 reported | 0.01× | 0.24× | 93% | 33% | |
| BetaLower is better · 1,320 reported | 1.75 | 0.53 | 7% | 33% | |
| Current ratioHigher is better · 1,338 reported | 6.61× | 2.62× | 80% | 33% |
| Rank | Company | Market cap | Safety | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.6B USD | 100 | 53 | |
| 1 | 6.6B USD | 100 | 45 | |
| 3 | 186M USD | 100 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1.5B USD | 100 | 44 | |
| 5 | 1.2B USD | 100 | 40 | |
| 553 | 7.2B CNY (≈$1.0B) | 60 | 74 | |
| 554 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score
| 34.2B CNY (≈$4.8B) |
| 60 |
| 59 |
| 555 | 3.1B CNY (≈$439M) | 60 | 25 |
| 556 | 11.9B USD | 60 | 53 |
| 557 | 89M USD | 59 | 31 |
| 558 | 16.8B USD | 59 | 75 |
| 559 | 11.2B EUR (≈$12.3B) | 59 | 63 |
| 560 | 3.5B USD | 59 | 75 |
| 561 | 3.2B USD | 59 | 65 |