Bringing the fundamentals into focus…
Back to TriNet Group, Inc.
How TriNet Group, Inc. stacks up
TNET · against 580 other Industrials companies of similar size
Valuation
65/ 100
Above the middle of the pack.
Ranked #215 of 581 · scores higher than 62% of peers
Bars: peers in each 10-point band of the valuation score70 peers with a valuation score of 60–69, including TNET · Click a bar to see the companies
Why valuation scores 65?
Weighted metrics compared with all Industrials companies.Mainly thanks to its free cash flow yield and earnings yield, which are stronger than most Industrials peers.
- EBITDA yield is close to the peer norm. EBITDA yield: 7.6% vs peer median 6.9%
- higher earnings for the price paid: stronger than 69% of peers. Earnings yield: 5.9% vs peer median 3.8%
- more free cash flow for the price paid: stronger than 82% of peers. Free cash flow yield: 9.8% vs peer median 3.7%
Metric by metric
Position: dot = TNET, ranked from the worst peer (left) to the best (right); tick = middle, shaded = middle half of peers.| Metric | TNET | Peer median | Better than | Position among peers | Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Earnings yieldHigher is better · 578 reported | 5.9% | 4.5% | 66% | 30% | |
| EBITDA yieldHigher is better · 588 reported | 7.6% | 7.9% | 47% | 50% | |
| Free cash flow yieldHigher is better · 191 reported | 9.8% | 4.3% | 84% | 20% | |
| Book yieldHigher is better · 579 reported | 2.8% | 44.8% | 1% | Context only |
Ranking by valuation score
Top 5 and the companies ranked around TNET| Rank | Company | Market cap | Valuation | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.69T KRW (≈$3.4B) | 100 | 59 | |
| 1 | 3.0B USD | 100 | 62 | |
| 1 | 3.5B USD | 100 | 57 | |
| 4 | 22.0B HKD (≈$2.8B) | 99 | 82 | |
| 4 | 26.4B HKD (≈$3.4B) | 99 | 63 | |
| 215 | 5.1B USD | 65 | 54 | |
| 215 | 5.6B USD | 65 | 50 | |
| 215 | 6.9B NZD (≈$4.1B) | 65 | 54 | |
| 215 | 2.1B EUR (≈$2.3B) | 65 | 39 | |
| 215 | 2.9B USD | 65 | 48 | |
| 215 | 4.4B USD | 65 | 62 | |
| 225 | 20.6B CNY (≈$2.9B) | 64 | 53 | |
| 225 | 20.0B CNY (≈$2.8B) | 64 | 77 | |
| 225 | 146.6B TWD (≈$4.5B) | 64 | 51 |
Scores are sector-relative percentiles from the latest snapshot, always calculated against the whole sector: narrowing the comparison group changes who you compare with, not the scores. Missing metrics are left out and the remaining weights rescaled. How we score